A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst possible neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted national interest following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family members house at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a extremely publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction performs at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, request to make their relatives residence. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their future neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, bringing about an encroachment over a Specific Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such spots are subject matter to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specially in the delicate coastal setting like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which is partly designed, is in the right placement. Their legal group has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their see, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, where sights of the sea are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-superior water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering that turn out to be emblematic with the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Moments described, describing how the two Guys entered the drinking water during severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning grew to become One of the more putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that such steps ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated in detail because of the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second from the authorized timeline.
For the core in the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as built, goes past what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and problems connected to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental defense and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as a substitute that it's about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair basically endeavoring to build a relatives residence in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Area of Conservation and say that each one performs happen to be completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised ideas. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any condition that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier famous that the businessman had previously been involved in regional advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from extremely diverse professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded via midsection-higher drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical reality Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site on the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains unsure. The courtroom have to decide whether the wall as crafted complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning problems. Nonetheless the human factor stays central: neighbours who have to Are living alongside each other long once the legal charges have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development will work at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong outside of that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition, it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles including environmental protection and assets legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Irrespective of whether it can in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will rely on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Among the most closely viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.