A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours about the construction of a wall in a coastal site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted nationwide awareness next an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives household at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental fears, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development is effective at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, request to create their loved ones home. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result regions are issue to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably in the delicate coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partly created, is in the proper place. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, wherever views of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, a picture which has because turn out to be emblematic of your intensity with the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were intended to Collect visual evidence in the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how the two men entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of steps were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as readers sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant while in the lawful timeline.
In the core with the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as created, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is described as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and circumstances connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by worry for environmental safety and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it's about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply just attempting to create a relatives home in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Location of Conservation and say that each one functions are already completed determined by Qualified assistance and authorised designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea through a storm, tend not to alter the underlying information.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal web site has grown to be a shorthand description for the scenario that many observers see as progressively popular. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between private land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become far more contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier famous which the businessman had Earlier been involved with area advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from extremely distinct Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by way of waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive strategy.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with setting up authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Particular Space of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and planning problems. However the human component stays central: neighbours who should Dwell together with one another lengthy after the legal prices have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development operates at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case increase further than that address. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when basic concerns which include environmental protection and home rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre in the dispute stands partly created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Whether or not it's going to finally be altered, removed, or done as prepared will count on the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin recently.